Originally they said there was Global Cooling – Quick, cover the ice caps with black soot!
OK, I better get my earmuffs out.
Then the said there was Global Warming – Quick, stop using aerosol cans!
But, uh, you just said cooling…
Then they said there was Climate Change – Now stop using cars, Now!
Isn’t that what climates do?
Oh crap! Are there aliens shooting Climate Disrupter Phasers ???
This is not about facts or even weather. Its about owning the conversation.Its about owning the language. There are two facets here. The first is their failure to convince everyone to go along with their policies (of course, not being able to reproduce original data sets doesn’t help their science any). So they change the language to cover a larger set of outcomes – and by a larger set of outcomes I mean all outcomes.
(Global climate disruption is) more of a sort of generic blanket term, I guess, that can apply in all weather conditions.
The second is their contempt for everyone else’s intelligence. When the argument fails to incite the proper amount of panic and urgency, they change the language to something that sounds more terrible so that we will get scared and do what they want because they are the big smart guys in suits. Sometimes you just need a serious crisis.